Non-UKGC Licensed Casinos: Licences and Risks
Available in GB
Non-UKGC casinos may hold licences from other jurisdictions, but those credentials do not provide the same oversight as a UK Gambling Commission licence.
What “Non-UKGC” Means—and Which Licence You Are Looking At
A non-UKGC casino is an online gambling site that operates without oversight from the UK Gambling Commission. The label describes the regulator that does not supervise the site; it does not, by itself, tell you whether the operator holds a licence elsewhere. Some non-UKGC casinos are licensed by another jurisdiction, while others may make a licence claim that needs checking.
That distinction matters because “licensed” is not a single, universal status. A licence is issued under the rules of a particular jurisdiction and relates to the authority responsible for supervising the operator. A foreign licence and a UK Gambling Commission licence are therefore different credentials, even when both are displayed on a casino’s website.
What the label does—and does not—tell you
The phrase “non-UKGC” is about the absence of UK Gambling Commission oversight. It is not the name of a particular licence, a regulator or a uniform category with one set of rules. Nor does the label identify where a casino is based: an operator’s location and the jurisdiction that issues its licence are separate details.
This means that two non-UKGC casinos may have quite different licensing arrangements. One could hold a licence from a recognised overseas regulator; another could operate under a different authority or present unclear information about its status. The shared feature is simply that neither is supervised by the UK Gambling Commission.
Non-UK Registered Casinos: Licensing Explained
The same care applies when you see a casino described as “international” or “offshore”. Those terms do not establish who licensed it. To understand what stands behind a site, you need to identify the named regulator and the licence it claims to hold, rather than relying on a broad label or a logo.
Jurisdictions you may see named
Non-UKGC casinos are often associated with licensing jurisdictions such as Malta, Curaçao, Gibraltar and Anjouan. These names identify different places and authorities; they should not be treated as interchangeable versions of a UK licence. A reference to Malta or Anjouan, for instance, tells you which licensing jurisdiction the operator is pointing to, not that the UK Gambling Commission supervises it.
The licence information may appear in a casino’s footer, terms or other site pages. At this stage, the important point is to read the claim accurately: a casino naming an overseas jurisdiction is presenting an overseas licence, not a UKGC licence. The name alone does not explain the scope of the regulator’s oversight or settle whether the details are current and genuine. Those are separate questions from what “non-UKGC” means.
A list of UKGC-licensed online casinos, by contrast, would refer to operators holding licences from the UK Gambling Commission. It would not include a casino merely because that casino has a licence from Malta, Curaçao, Gibraltar or Anjouan. Likewise, searching for which online casinos are licensed by the UKGC is a different exercise from identifying non-UKGC casinos: the first concerns UKGC authorisation, while the second describes sites outside that regulator’s oversight.
Non-GamStop Curacao Casino Sites: Licence Checks
Keep the two descriptions separate
It is easy to read “licensed casino” as though it settled every question about a site. In practice, the phrase is incomplete unless you know who issued the licence. The regulator’s name is part of the information, not a technical footnote.
When a site says it is licensed, separate three ideas: the operator’s claim that it holds a licence, the jurisdiction named in that claim, and whether the UK Gambling Commission oversees it. For a non-UKGC casino, the last answer is no by definition. The first two need to be understood on their own terms; a foreign licence does not turn into UKGC oversight simply because the operator displays it prominently.
That is the useful starting point for comparing non-UKGC casinos: identify the regulator being named, and do not confuse an overseas licensing statement with a UKGC credential. The details of any particular licence—and what it requires—depend on the jurisdiction involved.
Best casino sites in the UK
- NightWinBonus: £900 + 400 free spins · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- DieselwinBonus: Welcome Pack 250% up to £4000 + 200 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- ChanzeBonus: Slots Welcome Bonus #1 200% up to €500 · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- Revery PlayBonus: 100% up to€1,000+ 100 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- SlotoSportBonus: 500% up to £ 10 200+ 777 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- NightLuckBonus: Welcome Pack + 805% Up To 6400€ + 280 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- ZombillionBonus: Welcome Pack 250% up to £4000 + 200 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- x3betBonus: Welcome Pack 100% Up to £1.000 + 200 Free Spins · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
The UK Legal Position: Operators and Players
The Gambling Act 2005 places the licensing duty on gambling operators, not on individual customers. A company that offers real-money gambling to people in Great Britain must hold a relevant operating licence from the UK Gambling Commission, wherever the company itself is based. A foreign address or a licence issued abroad does not remove that requirement when the operator is serving the British market.
A foreign licence is not a UK operating licence. An operator without the required UKGC licence is not authorised to provide gambling services to customers in Great Britain.
That distinction matters when you encounter an online casino not regulated by the UKGC. A foreign licence is not a UK operating licence, and an operator without the required UKGC licence is not authorised to provide gambling services to customers in Great Britain. The legal obligation rests with the business supplying the service; the Act is not framed as a criminal offence committed by a player merely by using an unlicensed site.
UK law does not explicitly prohibit British citizens from using gambling services licensed in other countries, and players do not commit a criminal offence under UK law simply by gambling on an unlicensed site. This is narrower than saying that every such service is lawful to offer in Britain, or that a foreign licence makes an operator compliant with UK requirements. The operator’s position and the player’s position are different questions.
You may therefore see a UKGC-licensed online casino alongside a site that holds a licence overseas but not from the UKGC. The difference is not just the location of the company. A UKGC licence is the authorisation required for an operator serving Great Britain; a foreign licence does not substitute for it. Nor does a site become UKGC-regulated because it accepts a British customer or displays a licence from another jurisdiction.
The position also depends on where you live. The Gambling Act 2005 applies in England, Wales and Scotland, but not Northern Ireland. If you are in Northern Ireland, or if you are a British citizen living elsewhere, do not assume the rules that apply to a customer in Great Britain settle your own legal position. Check the law where you are physically located and consider the terms under which the service is offered.
Curaçao Casino Licence in the UK: What It Means
Before using a foreign-licensed gambling service, take responsibility for checking local law and understanding the implications. In particular, distinguish between the fact that UK law does not explicitly criminalise a player’s use of an overseas service and the separate requirement for operators serving Great Britain to hold a UKGC licence. Those statements can both be true; neither turns an unlicensed operator into a UKGC online casino.
Why a Foreign Licence Is Not the Same as UKGC Protection
A foreign licence and a UK Gambling Commission licence are not interchangeable badges. A casino operating under a licence from another jurisdiction may be subject to rules there, but that does not place it under UKGC oversight. For you, the difference is practical: the protections and routes for help associated with UK-regulated gambling may not apply when you use a casino site without a UKGC licence.
UKGC-licensed operators serving customers in Great Britain must follow the Commission’s requirements. Those include mandatory safer-gambling measures intended to help customers manage their play. At a non-UK-regulated casino, responsible-gambling rules may be less stringent, and tools familiar from UKGC casino sites may not be available or may work differently. You should not assume that a feature offered on one site is required across all operators simply because the casino displays a foreign licence.
The distinction matters most when you want to act on a concern. A UK-regulated site must operate within the Commission’s framework, including its requirements around customer protection. A casino outside the UKGC is not accountable to that regulator in the same way. The existence of a licence elsewhere does not, by itself, give you the same safeguards or a UK-based route for raising a problem.
Loss of Protection
If you use a casino without a UKGC licence, you may not have access to the same safeguards, responsible gambling tools, or the UK’s Financial Ombudsman Service.
What protection looks like in practice
On a UKGC-licensed casino site, safer-gambling tools are part of the regulatory framework, rather than optional extras chosen solely by the operator. These measures are designed to help customers control gambling activity. The precise tools available can vary, but the important point is that UKGC oversight makes responsible-gambling obligations part of the operator’s duties.
Casino sites without a UKGC licence may apply their own policies under the rules of the jurisdiction that licensed them. Those policies can be less demanding, particularly around responsible gambling and data protection. A site might offer some controls, but their presence does not establish that they match UK requirements. Nor should a site’s general claim to be “responsible” be treated as evidence that a particular safeguard is mandatory or independently enforced.
Data protection is another area where the difference can affect you. Non-UK-regulated casinos may be governed by standards that are less stringent than those applying to UKGC-licensed operators. That does not mean every foreign-licensed operator handles information poorly; it means you cannot infer UK-level requirements from an overseas licence alone. Consider what personal information the site requests, how it explains its use, and what its privacy terms say before providing details.
Where you can take a concern
Customers of UK-regulated gambling operators can, where eligible, use the Financial Ombudsman Service for certain complaints about financial services. This is separate from the gambling regulator, but it is an important UK route for resolving some disputes. If you choose an offshore non-UKGC casino, you forfeit access to the UK’s Financial Ombudsman Service in relation to that gambling service. A foreign licence does not preserve that route.
That changes the balance if something goes wrong. You may have to rely on the operator’s own complaint process or whatever mechanisms apply in the licensing jurisdiction. Those are not equivalent to having UK recourse. The details of a site’s complaint procedure matter, but reading them cannot recreate access to a UK body that does not oversee the operator.
Do not mistake a casino’s customer-support channel for an independent remedy. Support staff can answer questions and handle requests, but they represent the operator. Whether a separate dispute process exists depends on the relevant framework and operator; it is not guaranteed by the fact that a casino holds a foreign licence. If you are deciding whether to play, check what routes are actually available before depositing.
The same caution applies to safety features. A casino site outside the UKGC may provide limits or other controls voluntarily, but UKGC-mandated tools are not assured there. If you rely on a particular safeguard to keep gambling within bounds, confirm that the operator offers it and understand how it works before opening an account. If it is absent, or its terms are unclear, do not assume it can be added later.
A licence answers only part of the question: it indicates a regulator’s authority over an operator, not that every protection familiar from UKGC casino sites UK will follow you abroad. For a player, the difference is not merely administrative. It can mean fewer required safeguards, less stringent data rules, and no access to the UK’s Financial Ombudsman Service.
Important Distinction
A GamStop exclusion does not block access to casinos that are not part of the scheme.
GamStop and Casinos Outside the Scheme
GamStop is the UK Gambling Commission’s online self-exclusion scheme. A person who registers with it asks gambling businesses covered by the scheme to prevent them from using their accounts for the chosen exclusion period. That boundary matters: Casinos not on GamStop are not part of the scheme, so a GamStop exclusion does not block access to them.
This does not mean that an overseas site is a UKGC casino operating outside GamStop. The terms are incompatible: a casino serving customers in Great Britain is required to hold a UK Gambling Commission licence, and casinos covered by GamStop are within the UK system. Sites described as outside the scheme are generally non-UK-regulated casinos, not UKGC casinos that have opted out. Calling one a “UKGC casino without GamStop” can therefore give a misleading impression about its status.
What a GamStop exclusion does—and does not do
GamStop applies to participating gambling businesses. It is not a device-level block, a general internet filter or a restriction that follows you onto every gambling website. If a site is outside the scheme, GamStop cannot prevent you from opening it, creating an account or attempting to gamble there. A search for a “casino not blocked by GamStop” may turn up such sites, but that description tells you only about the scheme’s reach; it is not evidence that the site is approved by the UK regulator.
That distinction can be easy to overlook when a website uses familiar language about self-exclusion. A statement that a casino is “not registered with GamStop” or “not signed up to GamStop” is not the same as a statement that the UKGC has accepted an exception. Casinos outside the scheme do not become UKGC-licensed by using that wording, and a GamStop registration does not extend its block to them.
A self-exclusion decision is intended to put distance between a person and gambling. Looking for a site that the scheme does not cover works against that purpose. If you registered because gambling was causing harm, access to non-participating sites can undermine the barrier you put in place. The important point is not simply that another site may be available; it is that the protection you arranged does not apply there.
If you are already self-excluded
Do not treat a casino’s availability as a reason to test whether you can gamble safely. A GamStop exclusion remains in place for the businesses it covers, but it does not promise to stop you reaching every gambling service. If you are trying to avoid gambling, avoid searching for alternatives outside the scheme and consider adding practical barriers around your access to gambling sites and payments. These steps are not substitutes for GamStop; they address the gap it cannot cover.
You can also seek support if gambling feels difficult to control. GamCare and GambleAware provide information and support for people affected by gambling. Contacting a support service does not require you to prove that you have lost a particular amount or reached a particular stage. If you are in immediate danger or distress, use the appropriate urgent support service in your area.
If you have not registered with GamStop but want to stop using participating online gambling accounts, the scheme is a route to self-exclusion from those businesses. Read its current terms directly before enrolling so you understand what it covers and how the exclusion works. Do not assume that it covers sites that are outside the scheme.
Why “outside GamStop” is not a safeguard
Some promotional descriptions present Casinos not on GamStop as a solution for people who want to continue gambling despite an exclusion. That framing reverses the purpose of self-exclusion. The fact that a site is accessible does not mean the scheme has assessed it as safe, or that it offers an equivalent exclusion arrangement. It means the site is outside the scheme’s reach.
Nor does a claim that a casino is “not affected by GamStop” establish that it has no safer-gambling tools of its own. The point is narrower: any tools it offers do not make it part of GamStop, and a GamStop exclusion will not carry over automatically. You would need to check what the site itself offers, but that is not a substitute for the exclusion you have already chosen.
A casino might offer an account closure or self-exclusion option of its own. Such a request applies according to that operator’s arrangements; it does not add the casino to GamStop or create a single block across other non-participating sites. Keeping track of separate arrangements can also leave more openings than a person intended to have. If you are trying to stop gambling, adding accounts at sites outside the scheme can make that task harder.
The phrase “UKGC casinos outside GamStop” is especially confusing. It can sound as though there is a category of UKGC-licensed casinos that are outside the UKGC’s self-exclusion system. For practical purposes, do not infer that from an advert or a casino’s own description. A site marketed as a UKGC casino not covered by GamStop should not be treated as proof of a gap in the regulator’s scheme; check what the claim actually means, and do not mistake access for approval.
The same caution applies to “UKGC casino sites not blocked by GamStop.” A website may be reachable while you are self-excluded, but that does not establish that it holds a UKGC licence or belongs to GamStop. The distinction is between a block imposed by a scheme and the wider availability of websites, not between two kinds of UKGC casino.
GamStop is one defined self-exclusion scheme, not a promise that every gambling service will be inaccessible. Knowing that limit is important before you register and particularly important afterwards. If your aim is to stop gambling, a site being outside GamStop is a reason to recognise that the scheme cannot block it—not a reason to regard it as a safe way around your exclusion.
How to Check a Casino’s Licence and Operator Details
A licence badge on a casino’s website is a claim, not proof. Before relying on it, identify the regulator named on the badge and look for the operator in that regulator’s public register. Search the register yourself rather than following a link supplied by the casino; a link can lead to a page that does not establish the site’s current status.
Check that the register entry matches the casino on three points: the company name, the licence status and its expiry date. A similar trading name is not enough if the legal company behind the site is different. If the register shows an expired licence, or the operator cannot be matched to the entry, do not treat the badge as confirmation.
Verifying a Licence
- Identify the regulator named on the licence badge
- Search the regulator’s official public register
- Match the company name, licence status, and expiry date
- Confirm the licence covers the specific gambling service being offered
For a UKGC-licensed site, use the UK Gambling Commission’s register to search for the operator and confirm that its licence covers the gambling service being offered. A UKGC licence checker can help establish whether an operator is listed, but the result should still be compared with the company details on the casino’s own terms or legal pages. A foreign licence is not a UKGC licence, so a register entry from another jurisdiction cannot establish UKGC authorisation.
For an Anjouan casino licence, compare the operator’s exact legal name and the licence’s current status and expiry date against Anjouan’s public register. Also check whether the licence is relevant to the service and market the casino is offering. An Anjouan entry does not give an operator permission to serve customers in the United Kingdom or other markets that Anjouan restricts.
If the site gives only a badge, uses a company name that differs from the register, or makes it difficult to confirm the licence details, treat the claim as unverified. These checks establish what the register says; they do not, on their own, tell you how a regulator handles player disputes or what protections apply.
Anjouan Licensing: What the Framework Does—and Does Not—Require
An Anjouan casino licence should not be read as proof that the operator’s games and finances are subject to the safeguards you might expect from a more prescriptive licensing system. The framework’s limits matter because they affect what can be independently checked and what may happen to your balance if the business fails.
For instance, Anjouan’s rules do not require operators to have their random number generators (RNGs)—the software that determines game outcomes—tested. Nor do they mandate audits or require player funds to be kept separately from the operator’s money. A casino may choose to commission testing or audits, or to segregate funds, but the licence alone does not establish that it has done so. If an operator makes such a claim, look for specific, current evidence rather than treating the Anjouan casino licence as confirmation.
The distinction over funds is particularly important. Where player money is not held separately, it may be mixed with the company’s own funds. Anjouan-licensed casinos do not guarantee segregation, so a player may be an unsecured creditor if the operator fails. That means you could have to seek repayment alongside other creditors, without a guarantee that your balance will be recovered. A displayed account balance is not the same as money protected in a separate account.
The authority’s role also has limits. It does not handle, mediate or decide player complaints. That is separate from the question of whether a casino has a customer-service process: an operator may accept complaints itself, but that does not mean the regulator will review the dispute or order a remedy. The framework therefore does not provide the authority as a route for resolving disagreements over an account or a payment.
These points concern what Anjouan’s own framework requires; they are not claims about every individual operator’s conduct. A non-UKGC regulated casino may state that it uses tested games or keeps funds apart, but those assurances need to be assessed on their own evidence. The licence does not make those measures mandatory.
For anyone reading a non-UKGC casino review, the useful question is not simply whether the site displays a licence. Ask what evidence supports any claims about game testing, audits and the handling of player money—and whether the licence framework requires those measures at all. Under Anjouan’s framework, it does not.
Gibraltar Casino Licence and UK Gambling Rules
Complaints, Disputes and What Happens When Terms Change
If a complaint involves an Anjouan-licensed casino, the first step is to raise it with the operator and keep a record of the correspondence, relevant account messages and the terms that applied. Under Anjouan’s framework, the operator must respond within 30 calendar days. That is a response requirement, not a deadline for settling the dispute or a promise that the outcome will favour you.
The distinction matters because Anjouan-licensed casinos do not offer an independent dispute resolution route comparable to the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) services approved for UKGC-licensed operators. ADR allows an outside body to consider a complaint when the operator and customer cannot resolve it between themselves. A reply from the casino, even within the required period, is not an independent decision.
If the operator rejects your complaint, gives an answer you consider inadequate, or does not resolve the issue, the Anjouan framework does not provide that equivalent independent route. Nor can you take the matter to the UK Gambling Commission for a ruling on a casino that is outside its regulatory system. A casino not licensed by the UKGC therefore leaves you without the UK regulator’s complaint process if a dispute arises.
The same practical problem can follow a change to the casino’s terms. If new terms affect a balance, a withdrawal or how an account is handled, your options depend heavily on the operator’s own complaint process and the applicable framework. Do not assume that a UK regulator can intervene simply because you are in Britain or because the casino accepted your registration.
Before depositing with a non-UKGC casino in the UK, read the complaints procedure and save the terms that apply to your account. Consider whether you would be willing to continue if the operator’s response were the only route available. The 30-day requirement sets an expectation for a reply; it does not supply an independent referee.
Deposits, Withdrawals and the Cost of a Bonus
Payment choice can look broader at a non-UKGC casino than at a UK-licensed site. Offshore operators may accept credit cards, e-wallets, bank transfers and cryptocurrency, sometimes using alternative payment processors. Some may also apply fewer restrictions to deposits or withdrawals. That flexibility is not a promise that every method will work for every customer, or that money can be withdrawn by the route used to deposit it.
Check the cashier’s withdrawal rules before paying in. A casino may require withdrawals to use a different method, impose conditions on eligible routes, or ask for verification before releasing funds. A listed deposit option is not evidence that it will also be available for withdrawals.
Payment times are not consistent across operators. Some descriptions put withdrawals from Casinos not on GamStop at between 24 hours and five business days, depending on the method; other accounts say a payout can take three or four weeks. That disagreement matters: without a regulatory clock to enforce a stated processing time, a fast estimate should not be treated as a reliable deadline. Some operators may also cap withdrawals by day, week or month, leaving a large win to be paid in instalments. Specialist reviews have reported such limits, but they should be checked in the casino’s own terms rather than assumed to apply everywhere.
Common Bonus Terms
Offshore offers may vary significantly from UK standards. Pay attention to:
- Wagering requirements (which can be 35x or more)
- Whether requirements apply to the bonus alone or the bonus and deposit combined
- Expiry windows for free spins (often between 24 and 72 hours)
- Potential withdrawal caps on winnings
Verification can add further friction. In addition to standard identity checks, specialist reviews have described operators asking for notarised documents or a video call before processing a withdrawal. These steps are not established across the market, but their possibility makes it sensible to read the withdrawal and verification rules before depositing. A delayed payment, a frozen account or a request for extra documents can turn an apparently simple payout into a drawn-out process.
A welcome bonus also has a cost in conditions. Offshore offers may carry wagering requirements of 35 times or more. A 40-times requirement, where it appears, can apply to the bonus and deposit together, to the bonus alone, or to the bonus and free spins; the offer’s wording determines which. Specialist reviews have also reported free-spin winnings subject to wagering of 30 to 50 times the winnings and withdrawal caps of £5 to £50. Those figures are not universal terms, so check the specific offer.
Free spins may expire within 24 to 72 hours, according to specialist reviews. A short deadline can leave little time to meet wagering conditions, while a withdrawal cap may limit what you can cash out even after completing them. Treat the headline bonus as a conditional offer, not cash: read its expiry, eligible games, wagering basis and withdrawal rules before accepting it.
Comparing Jurisdictions Without Treating Them as Interchangeable
A foreign licence is not a general certificate of safety. Malta, Curaçao, Gibraltar and Anjouan are separate licensing jurisdictions, with their own rules and regulatory arrangements. A casino’s licence therefore tells you which authority, if any, is responsible for oversight; it does not mean that the operator is covered by the UK Gambling Commission or enjoys the same safeguards as a UKGC casino.
That distinction matters when comparing an international non-UKGC casino with one licensed elsewhere. The label “licensed” is only a starting point. You need to identify the issuing authority and understand what that particular framework requires. Even two casinos based outside the UK may offer different routes for complaints, different oversight and different terms for customers. A licence from one jurisdiction cannot be used as evidence of protections provided by another.
Anjouan illustrates why checking the specific jurisdiction matters. Its licence does not authorise a casino to operate in the United Kingdom or in other markets designated as restricted. An Anjouan casino licence is therefore not permission to supply gambling services to British customers. The presence of a foreign licence does not change that restriction.
The practical limits matter too. Anjouan-licensed casinos are not required to connect to GAMSTOP or to provide an independent alternative dispute resolution service comparable to those approved under UKGC rules. A customer should not assume that a casino has either arrangement simply because its website displays a licence. This is a jurisdiction-specific point, not a claim that every foreign regulator has the same requirements.
For anyone comparing a “best” or “trusted” non-UKGC casino, the useful question is not which foreign licence sounds most familiar. It is whether the operator’s stated regulator matches the relevant public record, what that regulator actually oversees, and whether the licence permits the activity being offered in the customer’s market. A newer operator deserves the same checks; being new does not itself establish stronger oversight or a better route if something goes wrong.
The comparison with a UKGC casino is also a comparison of regulatory scope, not just branding. In Great Britain, operators serving customers must hold the relevant UK Gambling Commission licence. A foreign licence does not substitute for it. If you are weighing a UKGC-licensed site against an offshore non-UKGC casino, do not treat the two as interchangeable options with different names. Check the jurisdiction, the operator and the limits of its authority before deciding what the licence means for you.
What happens if I have a dispute with an Anjouan-licensed casino as a UK player?
You cannot use an independent dispute-resolution service comparable to UKGC-approved ADR, and the Anjouan authority does not handle or decide player complaints. The operator must respond to complaints within 30 calendar days.
Is it legal for a UK player to gamble at an Anjouan-licensed casino?
UK law does not explicitly prohibit you from gambling with a service licensed overseas, and you do not commit a criminal offence simply by using an unlicensed site. An Anjouan licence does not authorise the operator to serve the UK market; operators serving Great Britain need a UK Gambling Commission licence.
Is an Anjouan licence as good as MGA or UKGC?
An Anjouan licence is not equivalent to a UK Gambling Commission licence: it does not authorise operation in the UK. Anjouan’s framework does not require RNG testing, audits or segregated player funds, and it does not provide a comparable independent dispute-resolution route.
Are Anjouan-licensed casinos safe and fair?
An Anjouan licence alone does not guarantee that a casino is safe or fair. The framework does not mandate RNG testing, audits or segregation of player funds, so you should not treat the licence as proof of those protections.
Are gaming sites not on GamStop permitted for UK players?
Not being on GamStop does not by itself make a site authorised to serve the UK market. Operators serving Great Britain need a UK Gambling Commission licence, while UK law does not explicitly prohibit you from gambling on an overseas-licensed service.
Related posts
Terms of Use
UK Gambling Casino Sites and Online Slots
